|
|
|
|
Home > Timex Global Trainer Heart Rate and GPS Watch
|
|
Timex Global Trainer Heart Rate and GPS Watch
|
|
Show more by Timex
|
|
|
|
Product Description:
|
|
|
|
Get pace, speed, distance, and more on your wrist. With SiRFstarIII GPS technology and ANT+ compatibility, this Ironman Global Trainer GPS watch from Timex records your performance across several dimensions--including pace, speed, distance, and more--providing real-time data on a customizable screen. The watch measures your location with altitude ascent and descent distances and rates, records up to 100 location waypoints to track back and create routes, and recalls up to 50 custom routes for pace tracking. The device offers six modes of operation including performance and multisport modes. The SiRFstarIII GPS technology requires no calibration. Features: - Customizable screen display show up to four windows of information
- 20-workout memory with dated summary records up to 1,000 laps of information
- Chronograph with interval and countdown timers measures performance
- Records elapsed time, calories burned, and performance data for each lap
- Hands-free option automatically starts and stops data capture functions
- Compatible with Windows XP or newer and with Mac OS X10.6 (Snow Leopard) or newer
- Battery recharges when connected to USB port or to any electrical outlet with included AC adaptor
- English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German and Italian language support
- Indiglo night-light
- Durable, lightweight resin case
- Top pusher for easy operation
- Durable resin strap
- Water-resistant to 50 meters
Manufacturer's Warranty
This Timex watch (but not any battery, crystal, band, or strap) is warranted to the owner for a period of one year from the date of purchase against defects in manufacture by Timex Corporation--not by the dealer from whom the watch was purchased. If this watch develops such a defect within the one year period, it will be repaired or replaced at the company's option. Timex will not provide any warranty service if your watch shows evidence that it has been tampered with, misused, abused, or altered. About Timex
Timex Group designs, manufactures, and markets innovative timepieces and jewelry globally. Timex, founded in 1854, has expanded to become Timex Group, a privately held company, with several operating units and over 5,000 employees worldwide. One of the largest watch makers in the world, Timex Group companies include the Timex Business Unit (Timex, Timex Ironman, Opex, TX, Nautica, Marc Ecko); Timex Group Luxury Watches (Valentino, Salvatore Ferragamo); Sequel (Guess, Gc); Vertime (Versace, Versus); and Vincent Bérard.
|
|
|
|
Customers' Reviews:
Add Your Own Review |
|
 No Go: Very weak GPS and Proprietary Workout Software is an Issue, December 15, 2010
By Anthony (London, UK)
|
|
The specs of the watch are really good, but it is when you start using it that one realizes that the Timex Global Trainer does not perform to expectations.
Firstly, the GPS in the watch, although it uses the same chip as that of the Garmin Forerunner, the performance in the Timex Global Trainer is extremely inaccurate. i.e. it takes an average of 5-7min to lock the satellites, unlike other devices, which can lock satellites in matter of seconds. Also, once a session is recorded and loaded onto a map (such as Google Maps), one can appreciate that the tracking of the device is very inaccurate. I have seen distance reading erros of up to 12% (e.g. you run 10miles and the watch says you have run 8.8miles!!) , which is very very bad. Other GPS watches only have a 2% error max accuracy (i.e. Garmin). I have checked this issue on the internet and other user reviews on Timex's Global Trainer GPS show this same issue. I have sent the watch to Timex, got it replaced for a new one, and the same issue persists. Timex hasn't got a solution to this.
Secondly, the workout data downloaded from the watch to the PC is proprietary and can only be used on the TrainingPeaks website. Forget about exporting you data to other better and cheaper websites such as MapMyRun or WorkOutLog. This wouldn't be a problem if TrainingPeaks had a good system, but it is slow and in many occasions it won't load 100% of the workout information (plenty of software improvement is needed on their side). TrainingPeaks has a cost of c. $20/month, while other websites only cost $20/year. The Free version of TrainingPeaks won't show you all of the information from your watch (e.g. HR zones, Cadence Zones, Power Zones, etc).
Conclusion: The GPS is a no go. On a spec basis the watch is not that expensive against competitors but if you include the cost of the software to visualize your workouts you need to add $+120/year, and thats another no go. I have bought the Garmin Forerunner 310xt, Garmin is better value for money and you are not stuck with proprietary software that doesn't work!
127 of 127 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
 Bummer, November 27, 2010
By John D. Lampassi (West Hills, CA)
|
|
The watch standing alone is a great item. I love the customization and all the great things this watch is able to do. However, knowing now that it'll cost me $120/year just to view the data from my workouts I would not have purchased this watch. When you upload the data to the website Training Peaks, it is clunky and difficult to navigate. The lack of customization in your personal account completely contrasts with the way in which this watch works. You are able to use a free account to view your data, but this is almost useless because any of the important data you would want to track is only available in the premium account for $120/year. I had owned the Suunto T6C and even though it was not GPS it had a much better interface and way more data I could track - there was no website to go to. All in all I am very disappointed that I spent all this money just to have a mileage counter on my wrist.
127 of 127 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Buy a Garmin, January 2, 2011
By Jen (Houston, TX)
|
|
First let me say that I'm a seasoned triathlete (3 IM's) and I also have the Garmin 405. While the 405 has been a great watch, the shortcomings it has is that I can't swim with it, and when I work out and it's humid, sweat can find it's way to the bezel and it'll start beeping like mad. That is what prompted me to get the Global Trainer. I can swim with the watch, and don't have to worry about it going beeping crazy.
Few points on each watch:
Global Trainer:
-The functionality is great, and I can set up each sport with a variety of data, ultimately splitting the screen into 1,2,3, or 4 pieces of data like heart rate, pace, distance...
-It's fairly easy to use on the fly. Tracking splits, or going from a bike to a run is very easy
-It's comfortable for being such a huge watch
-Acquiring the satellites was relatively quick
-The display doesn't look very polished. When in time mode (non-gps) it's like looking at a stop watch.
-Downloading data to a PC is a joke. It's fickle, and even when you have the device agent up, and the watch connected, it's a trial in patience. This is where the 405 beats the Global Trainer hands down. The Garmin will transfer data automatically, and do it without having to connect the watch to a cable.
-Included software with the Timex is functionally minimal. You can pay $19.99 a month for a "enhanced" version of the training center, where Garmin will give you much of the same functionality for free.
Overall, the Timex is a huge disappointment. My recommendation would be wait for a future version where they have the kinks worked out, and don't nickle and dime you to see your training data after you've already plopped down a few hundred dollars.
127 of 127 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
 I like it., February 14, 2011
By Mike (youngstown, ohio)
|
|
Had a 305, a 405 and now this Timmex Ironman GPS. I have worn the 405 and this watch together on long runs at the same time. I have also ran with this watch while my friend was wearing his 305. The GPS of this watch is very accurate and over 12 miles i found less than a .1 mile difference from the 405 and about a quarter mile from the 305. I have worn this watch in a marathon and it logged 26.3 miles. My 405 would commonly log 26.5 in marathons. I do agree it can be finnicky on downloading to computer. However the program that comes with the watch, without purchasing the extra features shows me a map and seems fine to me. It logs my minutes fine, my averages fine and like the 305 allows 4 displays at once. I also have had no problem finding a gps signal, nor have i lost a signal in one single race. It is definitely more reliable than the 405 which has frozen up on occasion and has become locked in jumping back and forth between different functions. The 405 is not nearly as reliable, but the size is great.
Likes of the timex GPS. NOTE, i wear these watches in Marathons.
Great 4 display
Accurate GPS
Easy to operate
Cons, bigger than 405
Overall, functionality of 305 is #1 but very bulky, Timex is a close second to the 305 on functionality and slightly smaller. the 405 comes in third. 405 Locks up, finicky when wet or sweating. Overall timex is king. Maybe the 410 will step in and change it all, we shall see.
48 of 52 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
 Become a better athlete and gain more freedom in your workouts, February 21, 2011
By S. Ackerson (Annapolis, MD)
|
|
UPDATE: 10/2011 - Over the summer Timex release updated firmware. GPS acquisition is much improved. Firmware update also provides functionality for ANT+ foot pod for cadence tracking. This in additional to ANT+ compatible HRM, bike speed, bike cadence and bike power. Love this product!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have been a long time user of the Timex Ironman watch series including the RaceTrainer with HRM. I'm a triathlete turned marathoner and decided it was time to upgrade to a GPS unit, primarily so I could more easily track mileage without having to use tedious applications like MapMyRun or MS Excel. I reviewed Garmin and Suunto but read so many mixed reviews that I could not make a decision. Knowing the reliability of previously owned Timex watches, I was really happy to see them launch a GPS device.
My first couple of weeks using the watch was a little frustrating so be prepared for a learning curve. I had a hard time getting the GPS to acquire a position and didn't entirely understand some of the configuration settings. The user manual isn't particular helpful but I kept at it until I had it working the way I wanted. Now that I've owned it for two months, I can say that without a doubt, I am very pleased with the Timex Global Trainer GPS.
Features:
SIZE - Like all built in (non-external pod) GPS watches, it is a little bulky. Not exactly something that you would want to wear outside of training and racing.
SCREEN - The fairly substantial screen size allows you to customize viewable items. For example, I have mine setup for RUN I, RUN II, BIKE I, BIKE II and SWIM. For RUN I, I have it configured to show distance, pace, HR and split. In RUN II, I show altitude, pace-average, HR-average, lap. For biking, I purchased Bontrager ANT+ Speed and Cadence sensors so I can show bike specific items. Any ANT+ compatible sensor is easily found by the device (HRM, Speed, Cadence, Power). The ability to customize screens and features is really nice and can all be done using the device agent software rather then on the watch directly, a great feature.
POWER - No problems. I charge mine with the USB computer connector when I sync to TrainingPeaks. Even on long runs (2+ hours), the power meter shows plenty of power remaining (70%+). I might be concerned about power in a 10+ hour full 140.6 IM. However, I'd probably just use the device for the bike and run portion and skip using it on the swim. Device does include a bike mount which works fine.
GPS - As I said at the start, I did experience a little trouble getting a signal at first. I'm not sure why, but that initial problem has gone away. Maybe it just knows where I live now? :-)
Indeed, you should not expect to just turn it on and immediately get a signal (but sometimes I do), so plan to power up the GPS 3-5 minutes prior to beginning your workout. On occasion and when it doesn't find a signal within 60 seconds or so, I simply power off and power back on. Problem solved. I get a signal on the first floor of my house and sometimes even in the basement when I'm working out on my bike trainer.
One issue I do have with the GPS is that if I'm running a zig-zag route, it does tend to "cut the corners" which likely results in a decreased pace reading and underestimated distance figure. I would have to think that this is common of all GPS devices. Also, the altitude readings seem to go up and down a little more then they should. Not a big issue.
TRAINING PEAKS and DEVICE AGENT - Device Agent is the syncing and configuration software and trainingpeaks.com is the website where logs are sent and viewed. Basic features on trainingpeaks.com are free but you can purchase a subscription to add more features (or PODS). I know there are some critical posts about the website and the "need" to pay for the subscription but for 95% of us, the free service is more then adequate.
Like the watch itself, it took me a couple of weeks to get used to using trainingpeaks.com. Now, I love it. Again, I only use the free service but I love being able to view my workouts, see maps, charts, weekly summaries, and so much more. To be honest, this watch has helped motivate me to increase my training volume just I can ring up bigger numbers each week!
Furthermore and with the combination of GPS and TrainingPeaks, I feel a lot more freedom in my running and biking. Rather then running the same old routes where I know the distance, I'm free to "turn right", "turn left" or just explore on long runs. I know the GPS is keeping track so I just go wherever I like.
Bottom line, I highly recommend the product but do be prepared for a 2-4 week learning curve. I paid ~$215 less a $50 promo discount that was running around Christmas '10. Great deal.
18 of 19 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Class action lawsuit anyone?, February 26, 2011
By MegaConsumer (USA, Ohio)
|
|
This is without question the worst product on the market I have yet experienced. The bottom line: take your chances with a different manufacturer.
If you want a watch that DOESN'T sync with the cadence monitor, DOESN'T sync with the heart rate monitor and rarely finds a GPS signal, then this watch is for you. If however you are a serious athlete, or just expect to get what you pay for, then you will be very disappointed in the Timex Global Trainer.
If you plan on taking your chances by purchasing this device and need to ship the watch back to Timex for repair, count on a 4 week inconvenience of being without the training device. The lousy warranty, return policy and customer service is Timex's way of saying thank you for being a sucker and buying our product.
In addition, data loaded from the watch to the Timex Device Agent software is out of sync. Loaded times, distances, etc. are off by a few seconds, feet, etc. The only explanation is poor firmware/software design and development. One more frustration you can look forward to if you purchase this product.
The Timex Global Trainer is a great concept, but unfortunately Timex failed to bring a reliable product to market, and more importantly, failed to understand the market itself. A training aid like this can be invaluable, when it works. If it doesn't work it's just an extreme annoyance embedded in an already demanding schedule.
I will never buy Timex products again. I don't like flushing money down the drain, and I have enough to worry about juggling work, training and family without troubleshooting what is suppose to be a simple piece of technology.
Spend your money with a company that "gets" athletes' and builds reliable products.
16 of 21 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Smart, August 16, 2010
By Robocop (Perú)
|
|
Nice on-screen performance display arrangement and easy to customize for up to 5 sports. the Multisport function is smart and convenient (for Triathlons) - it will let you track your times and performance from beginning to end of the whole race, changing from Swim-T1-Bike-T2-Run with the touch of one button.
The watch is bulky but light.
12 of 18 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Ironman GPS, May 14, 2011
By Bicigodo
|
|
I have been using different brands of cycling gadgets for many years, but have never had so much trouble to configure one before.
In one point I touched a program to change the screen intensity, it became very light and never found how to set it back to normal.
I guess I will keep on using Garmin or Polar equipment .
8 of 8 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
 Not durable enough for a run in the rain, April 5, 2011
By Bolick (Lenoir, NC)
|
|
Overall I liked the gps/functionality of the watch. However, I ran 8 miles in a steady rain and water entered into the watch and condensed on the lens making it very difficult to see. I have returned the watch since I had originally bought it to use in triathlons. I would hate to see what would have happened taking it into the pool.
7 of 8 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Buyer beware, June 1, 2011
By THERESA
|
|
The heart rate monitor stopped working in less than 6 months so I mail it in a long with a check to cover return shipping just to find out it takes them 2 weeks to even open the package once it arrives at the repair center. REALLY?!? TWO STINKING WEEKS to just open the box or confirm that the watch has even arrived at the repair facility?!?! Call Daren in customer support if you don't believe me, he'll tell you. Save yourself the hassle and aggravation of dealing with Timex and buy a Garmin.
7 of 10 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Watch is Very Good - Training Peaks Not So Good, March 22, 2012
By R. Baker
|
|
Even though I know there are spoof reviews and people who write reviews just to rant, I am thankful for all the candid reviews I read about this watch. Economics (the low price) were a very driving factor but I did not want to piss $130 on a piece of junk. I am a graphic design/web dude by trade and all I can say is that whomever wrote the code for the Training Peaks software must be having great sex with the CEO's wife or daughter. The UI (user-interface) is worse than a high-school project. Windows within windows within windows. So many violations of UI laws of design. What I suspect is the Training Peaks (COMPETITOR GROUP) met with the Timex folks and SOLD them that their software was going to be the key to their successful sales of the watch. REALLY BAD and igno move on Timex. The Garmin software is easy to understand but far from perfect and Garmin updates always seemed very peculiar and half-ass.
Ok, on to the watch. BTW, anyone that knows anything should have already read DC Rainmakers reviews of this watch and every other gadget under the sun. That guy knows how to review. He wrote his review of this watch before the new firmware release and he gave it a thumbs up and actually I refer to his website just to learn what this watch can do.
Size: I have big wrists and wear it daily to work. I charge it at night and it charges quickly. The displays are easy to read and once you learn how to customize your screens, it is great.
GPS: The signal has been very reliable for me here in Las Vegas. One time thus far I have had to reboot the watch a couple of times to get a signal.
Shockproof: Another feature I like about Ironman watches and was interested in this, is that it seems to have good shock proof. I dropped my Garmin 405 about 2 feet and it cracked the bezel.
Buttons: Easy to use
Export File: Ok, this is where so many reviewers showed their ignorance. YOU CAN export your tracks to a Google .KML file. Then, using the free Babel softward you can convert that to a .gpx file type and upload to any of your favorite workout sites. I want to reiterate this. Even though the free Training Peaks software sucks, you can upload your workout to the free Training Peaks software and export the file as a .kml filetype. It might take to a while to figure this out but it can be done.
I have also come to realize as a triathlete having a watch for open water swimming is ridiculous. Most people end up putting the watch under their swim cap but that was too much of a pain for me. I just purchased to the goggle mount Finis gps unit for $100...so, especially for a race....I can log my swim yardage and time, throw my goggles in my transition bag and then click my watch for the balance of the bike and run.
I am NOT a fan of the multisport application but I have only toggled that on once so I might need how to learn it more.
I have had no problem connecting to my Windows Vista computer.
The heart rate monitor works great.
Ok...so, if ultimately my decision was based on economics.....as it stands this is how I would better rate this watch:
If this watch cost $300 I would NOT purchase it -
If this watch cost $250 I would NOT purchase it -
If this watch cost $225 I would seriously consider purchasing it -
If this watch cost $200 I would purchase it -
If this watch ever comes out with a different software program I would happily pay $300+ for it.
Paying $500 for a Garmin watch is absolutely ridiculous and the new Finis product will definitely put a nick in that business. Once racers start seeing how much better it is to have a swim-specific device, this Timex is the right price for a good product.
7 of 7 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Nice Watch, April 4, 2011
By Ironbeast
|
|
Nice product. I had a garmin 405 and it didnt have the multi sport function and it was bad in the rain or when it got wet. This one works great I have used it in the pool and the ocean works great. Gps was alittle slow at finding the satellites but when it did was very accurate. heart rate monitor was easy to use and functioned well.
The setup menue was alittle confusing at first but once you figure it out it was easy to move around.
The buttons are big but when I was on my bike it turned off beacuse my hand it the button. When you lock the watch you cant switch the modes or start or stop the watch.
Over all very happy with the watch and it preformed well
6 of 6 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
dissapointed, March 19, 2011
By chiefiyall
|
|
Timex should be ashamed. The gps never worked correctly. It was inacurate and only worked at all when it felt like it. When it did work it took 10 to 15 minutes to sync up with the sattalite so I was already a couple miles into my run. Didn't even try the heart monitor because I was so dissapointed in the gps. Seems like a good idea, I liked the split screen concept it just needs some major improvements.
6 of 7 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
It's a great tool; got it at a nice price too., December 30, 2010
By Iain
|
|
Note: I have never owned a GPS/HR watch like this before, so I cannot compare it against the Garmins or Suuntos. However, I did do a lot of research and took a leap of faith when I saw that Amazon had it for $175 (HR+watch) after the $50 Timex rebate. I did spend a few days with buyer's remorse that I may have not gotten something that would work but it all cleared up after my run this morning. I also was tempted numerous times to buy the Garmin 310xt (was holding off due to price, to see the TGT drop by almost 50% off MSRP...immediate buy). I've owned the unit for 3 days, made 4 runs (3 indoors). Also posted this review on [...] (because they had a very reasonable but initially bad review on TGT; I do appreciate the reviews that beat a product down).
Review proper - Just did a 10mi with the TGT. I have really no complaints now. I had some issues getting a satellite fix before, but after went outside and set it on the trunk of the car while doing a 30s stretch, the thing sat-fixed. The beep is most satisfying after so many tries while in the apartment to fix. The position where I got a fix was just one floor down and a few meters out. I guess there is a necessity for the SIRFStarIII to have a 360 deg view of the sky before fixing. A few days ago, I also couldn't get a gps fix (that was the first time) but setting it outside for about 5-10 mins for an initial synchronization did it. It was the second gps fix today, because I normally run on a treadmill.
I think a lot of the issues have been rectified. The main complaint now has devolved to just a comfort issue because the watch face is fairly hefty and knocks constantly on my wrist bone. After 9 mi, it starts to actually feel sore and I had to switch to the other hand.
Some other niggles are basically location-based; I got elevation gains when there shouldn't have been any whilst running under a flyover etc. I do live in a busy city so this is something that is completely understandable. I got through 50-80m stretches (the flyover is an elevated highway or overhead electric rail) that run parallel to the road without significant loss of data that cannot be smoothed out.
In general I'm quite pleased with the watch, but it is my first GPS/HR watch so I cannot compare it against Garmin 310xt/405 or now the 110.
Firmware: v.2.94
Date: 12/31/10
Running time: 61min
Distance: 9.43mi (TGT), 9.2mi (Google Earth) [I don't think it's bad due to the heavy building/infrastructure interference]
HR: I think it felt worse than the reported value although the time-smooth HR would be accurate due to the constant start-stops in morning traffic (even on New Year's Eve!)
Hope this helps!
6 of 9 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Almost Got Crippled By It, March 30, 2011
By K. Fung
|
|
I bought this during Christmas about 4 months ago, and I had been using it for my training runs. I ran my first (ever) 1/2 marathon over this weekend. I am glad I survived the race, but just barely. I had leg cramps like never before. I largely blame my trouble to this device. Let me explain how and why.
I used the "Performance Pacer" feature during my race, which means I input the distance (13.1 miles) I planned to run with the time I wanted to finish the course at. So during the run, it will display for example, 1:30 min, 2 min, 2:33 min, etc. with a small word in front of it to show "ahead" or "behind". And I need to emphasize "small". It is so tiny that I had big problem reading it clearly. During my race, instead of getting assurance that I was on target or actually "ahead" by several minutes, I thought I was behind, and kept falling "behind". So I thought. About 1/2 way through the race, when I mistakenly thought that I was far behind by more than 8 minutes, I really strike it hard, trying to regain ground. By the 11 - 12 mile markers, I totally ran out of steam, completely exhausted and frustrated. Eventually I got cramps so severely that I had to stop and walk. At the end, I did cross the finish line, but completely ruined, both physically and mentally. Not until I was shutting this damned thing off, that I realized "Wait a minute, I was running AHEAD of my scheduled time, NOT behind?!!
In summary, the biggest complain I have with this device is the display. It is very small and hard to read. Yes, this thing allows 4 fields of display with a total of 5 viewing screens. But if you set it as such, the info becomes so tiny that the only to see it would be sitting behind a desk with a magnifying glass. How would a runner suppose to see anything during the run, with arms swinging and sun in the eyes? Yes, I set it to only one single field, the largest possible display, and still look at what happened. Another thing is, instead of using small font like "ahead" or "behind", maybe it should use symbols, such as a big + or - sign. None of these are customizable, nor is this thing very user friendly.
Also I expected to see more update on firmware, but so far there hasn't been any in the last 4 months. Over all, quite unhappy with this thing. Only deserve 2 stars.
6 of 15 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Better than Garmin!, June 8, 2011
By seb gva
|
|
Hi, i had lost my Garmin 305 into the sea while doing windsurfing... so had to look for another GPS watch, as using it also for running and biking.
After some reviews and hesitation, went for the Timex... and actually, i'm very happy.
Less big than garmin, easier to wear + lighter, the screen / display is not too small at all (vs. some reviews). I've normal eyes and can read without an issue my speed or other data on the 4 quadrants screen.
Used on half marathon, the distance was perfectly right at 50m. Time to set-off satellites, once done once and without reset, is pretty fast.
haven't used all the settings yet (not yet open the book as it is very intuitive software). Actually, this latter point is the biggest + i'll give. garmin watch software sucks so much, it makes you feel you are in the 80s when user friendly concept was not even existing. Timex is much better, though not yet to a 2010 level i find.
Anyhow, for a cheaper price, definitely worth buying.
have fun
5 of 5 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
HR ANT+ Sensor Died in a few Months, May 16, 2011
By scott yeats (LEAGUE CITY, TX, US)
|
|
We have two of these units. One has worked great, the other not so good. It has always been off on distance measurements (1/4 mile in 2 miles). Both watches are using the same settings. Just recently the HR function stopped working. We narrowed it down to the sensor (tested with the other sensor). We replaced the battery but no joy. I am now trying to get it replaced.
5 of 5 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Too complicated for me, June 9, 2011
By Knight Writer
|
|
I followed the directions and was able to access the satellites, but there were just too many functions and I never was able to get the Global Trainer to give me the kind of information I was looking for, i.e., distance, speed, calories burned and heart rate. For some reason, I couldn't even get the timer to reset. When I charged the battery, the timer read 05:00 and I couldn't get it back to 00:00.
In the interest of full disclosure and fairness to Timex, I am somewhat technically challenged. This product may work fine for others who are less technically challenged than I am.
I am training for my first marathon and I just want something to help me log the distances I run, record my pace per mile, and show me how much time my runs take so I can figure out how to get to where I can actually finish a marathon. Just basic information so I can see what I need to do to get from point A -- the starting line -- to point B -- the finish line 26.2 miles later. I returned the Timex and bought a Garmin Forerunner 305, which seems simpler to use, but I haven't tried it out yet. Will write a review when I do.
4 of 5 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Functional and Reliable, December 5, 2010
By Esther
|
|
Just run the marathon with the watch, prove be very reliable within 1% accuracy. The 4 quadrant display is useful in providing all the vital stats. Personally as a watch is it aesthetically more pleasing to the eyes compared to the Garmin. My first GPS watch got to say I am pretty impressed. The only concern is the battery life, got to do an ironman race to really gauge it's performance. Otherwise this is truly a great piece of technology.
4 of 7 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Ironman Training, December 18, 2010
By Kona Dream (South Carolina)
|
|
Awesome watch and once unpackaged, I had it up and running in 5 minutes. Great sale price which included an instant $50.00 rebate. The watch was less expensive than my Timex Ironman Triathlon watch. The watch connected to my online training account in seconds and I was able to adjust all fields through the PC. The size of the watch appears to be a concern, but was a non issue after the first five workouts. Have not used all the options of this watch, but for the price I am happy with Timex compared with the other like watches.
4 of 8 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great if you update the firmware!!!, March 8, 2012
By Dale E. Yauger II
|
|
Now, that I have owned and used the watch for a few weeks I can honestly say it works perfect! It was terrible when I first opened it and turned it on. The sat sync took forever. After updating the firmware it found the signal very quickly. If you get this watch make sure you get the firmware update as it fixes many issues with the watch. I could be wrong but I have a feeling the bad reviews on it are from people who did not update the firmware. The only reason I am giving it a 4 and not a 5 is because I wish the face were smaller.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
A year later, December 20, 2011
By mdot4ever
|
|
I've had my watch for a year now and the things that I loved about the watch then I still love, while the things that bothered me from day 1 still bother me today.
GOOD - Open course with few turns the GPS seems to be very accurate (more than many others). It easily finds any ANT+ device I have tried to connect to. The interface from both the watch and software is very user friendly. Due to the shape it does not feel as bulky as some of the other GPS systems. It is by far more of a classic style than many systems out there.
BAD - Coud, wind, rain, trees, buildings, high power lines all seem to impact this system more than many others. It has a hard time getting the initial sync with the sat if it is on my wrist. It has no problem if I take it off and lay it on the hood of the truck. The battery life doesn't seem to last as long, but it is still longer than many others.
Overall I am pleased with the purchase. I use it with a Timex Speed and Cadence sensor as well as the HRM. The S&C tends to drop out more than others, but that is a seperate issue.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Timex Global Trainer, December 7, 2011
By Losborn
|
|
I bought this watch a few months ago. I chose this one over the Garmin 405CX because I was looking for something a little more functional for biking...plus it has better battery life. I have used the Garmin 405CX a few times and I like the Timex better. The screen is bigger and it feels like a normal watch. I'm an average 21 year old male and I don't think the watch itself is ridiculously huge. It fits my wrist nicely and I barely notice it once I start running or riding.
I've read reviews about how the GPS isn't very accurate. They most have fixed that problem in a firmware update when they released their Run Trainer because as far as I can tell the GPS data I get from the GT follows very very closely to what I get from my bike's odometer as well as mapmyrun.com.
Training Peaks is the only downside to the GT. I don't want to pay for the premium software but the free version works just fine for any normal person.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
comes with bike mount included, December 14, 2011
By gk
|
|
I love the watch and especially for the price compared to the garmin. I already was using training peaks so that was an easy selling point for me. I've had no trouble with the GPS or the satellite locating at all. I have only had it for a couple of days at this point so my review is kind of an initial response to the product. It is a bit bulky for a daily watch so you shouldn't plan on wearing it as a timepiece unless you don't mind a big watch. DON'T BUY THE BIKE MOUNT SEPARATE. This product has the bike mount in the package but it is not listed anywhere that I could find so I ordered it too but there is no need. I'm going to inquire with amazon about returning it, so we'll see how that goes.
3 of 4 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Hate it, December 8, 2011
By nitsa (New York , New York United States)
|
|
I am a intermediate runner that trains for half and full marathons so I do not need many of these features. My main concerns is that it is difficult to use. It takes forever to download your training and the number one reason I really dislike is that I cannot read the monitor on the watch as I run. I wear reading glasses (not when I run) so as I run I would like to check and see how I am doing. The data is so small that even when I hit the button to light up the face of the watch I still cannot make out the readings.
I need a simpler watch that gives me the following information: LARGE numbers, pace, distance, time, heart rate and calories burned.
The price is extremely high (I purchased it for $299 when it first came out) Bottom line if I knew how miserable I would be with this watch I would have bought a Garmin with its large read outs and very easy features.
Don't waste your money. Shop around
3 of 4 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Good but a little complicated to use....., December 8, 2010
By George Clooney (Arlington, VA)
|
|
I'm a runner and this is perfect for tracking work outs, miles, distance, pace, speed, etc. You can customize the screen to show the metrics you prefer. My only complaint is that the screen is pretty small, especially when you break it into 4 separate mini screens for different metrics. I almost need reading glasses to read the data. Other than that, a nice GPS training watch. If they would enlarge the screen, I'd definitely buy again.
3 of 6 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Very pleased with my purchase, February 5, 2012
By Mike L.
|
|
Lets start with the primary motivating factor why I bought this watch and not a Garmin...Price. For $130 I got a GPS watch with full ANT+ capabilities that is also waterproof. The nearest equivalent Garmin is the 310xt that runs around $300-$360. I was debating between the Timex and the FR305 but was concerned about the fact that the 305 was not waterproof and that I was going to have to take the watch on and off during transitions (triathlon races).
I have had the watch for about a month now and I wanted to provide my own input on a couple of issues that are mentioned in other reviews.
GPS
I have used this watch in conjunction with a Cateye cycling computer and a Garmin Edge 500 computer. On trips over 30 miles all 3 systems have had a difference of less than .1 miles. In fact I have had the Timex be withing 1/100 of a mile over the same circuit multiple times. I have gained confidence and faith in this watch.
As to the time to get a signal lock. Before each use I leave the watch on a post for about 2 minutes as I stretch and lace up my shoes. By the time I am done getting ready the watch is ready to go. I have had no issues with signal loss during a run or ride.
Software
I feel that this is someplace where the Garmin is clearly superior to the Timex. Now that I have started using both the Garmin Connect site and the Timex Training Peaks site, I find the Garmin site to be much more detailed and have a cleaner user experience. Contrary to one review, I have had no issue uploading my runs to a third party site (BeginnerTriathlete.com).
Battery Life
To soon to tell as I have yet to wear the watch in GPS mode for more than 2 hours. At this amount of time the watch has had more than enough battery to finish a 13.1. I have plans for longer races in the coming months and will update this review if I find it has issues. One thing I do however is ensure I charge the watch prior to all uses.
Overall Impressions
I am completely satisfied with this purchase. While the Garmin software is superior it is not worth 200 dollars more. I have recommended this watch to multiple people and will continue to do so as long as the price stays at the low (sub $150) price point.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Good GPS watch, January 27, 2012
By Radio23231
|
|
Dont believe all the nay Sayers , I got the watch in dec of 2011. All updates from factory must have been done. It grabs gps signal right away. The 4 zone display is great. It is big watch, but what I use it for , running and bike it it's perfect, who cares how it looks as far as big watch. Hart rate monitor is perfect. No issues.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Excellent Training Watch, December 20, 2011
By Matt J. Meadath
|
|
I received the watch a couple of weeks ago and absolutely love it. It is a bit large, but once you get into the screen options, you'll understand why and appreciate it (you are wearing this for training, not a night out at the clubs). Everything is at your fingertips and it is very easy to set up and configure. MUCH easier than the Garmin (my wife has the Garmin 405). The satellite sync is also very fast. I read reviews where people had issues with this, but I have no issues with it and it syncs much faster than the Garmin. The multi-sport mode is another excellent feature. I already used Training Peaks so I have no issue with the software at all and would recommend that for anyone whether they have this watch or not. And if you are NOT training for duathlons/triathlons, then you really don't need such a sophisticated training watch. If you are, the Ironman GPS is a great choice.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
I love this Item, January 24, 2011
By Jose
|
|
I did a half marathon and when I set the watch at the beginning it gave me accurate data. I think is one of the best.
2 of 10 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Best Value in GPS watches for runners with a few gotchas, February 7, 2012
By VO Warrior (Durham, NC United States)
|
|
I purchased this watch back in December of 2010 and I have logged around a 1,000 miles with it since that time. Before purchasing the watch, I used my wife's Garmin 310xt for my runs, so the Timex layout and interface took some getting used to if you are familiar with Garmin Training Center and Garmin Connect. I now also own a Garmin 405 and I've logged over 500 miles wearing both the Timex and Garmin 405 at the same time. The early firmware releases took longer to grab satellites and were a bit off on accuracy, so I wouldn't even bother reading any review that predates the aug '11 firmware update. I just ran the 20 miler in Uwharrie and the Timex recorded 19.43 miles vs the Garmin 405 with 18.91 to give you an idea and this is on a course with a ton of elevation changes and tree cover. Since the latest firmware update the watch is much quicker to grab satellites. Previously I would just set it on my car roof while I laced up my shoes, as being perfectly still will allow any GPS watch to lock on to more satellites. Also, of note, I'm only using the Mac OS versions of the Timex DeviceAgent and Garmin software for these comparisons, as I do not use Windows for recreational computing purposes.
Pros:
*Durable (survived Tough Mudder Wintergreen, had to soak it in a bucket afterwards to get all the mud off)
*footpod support (aug '11 firmware, although I do not use a footpod outdoors)
*Accurate (I've logged over 500 miles wearing this watch and a Garmin 405 and the Timex is more accurate)
*Training Peaks (I use the free version and the iPhone app, they both work great, also works with SportTracks for Windows users)
*Buttons can be locked to avoid accidental presses during events
*Best Heart Rate Soft Strap on the market (I use the Timex strap exclusively with both Timex and Garmin products)
*Great battery life
Cons:
*no support for distance based interval workouts (you can only do time or heart rate based)
*audible alerts only (no vibration alert, as found on 310xt etc)
*no ant+ data transfer ability (must use the usb cable)
*no barometric altimeter (ok, it's not really fair to compare this watch to the $450 Garmin 910xt, but I can dream)
Overall I think this is a great GPS watch for under $160, especially for trail/mud runners or those in need of something durable and waterproof. I would put the accuracy above the Garmin 405 series and at least equal to the Garmin 310xt with the Aug '11 firmware update. As long as you don't need to setup distance based interval workouts, you can't go wrong with the Timex Global Trainer for the price.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Awesome watch!, January 29, 2012
By Boboli818
|
|
This watch is perfect. Satellites lock in fairly quick. All my training metrics get tracked, and battery life is great. Gps is very accurate. Size is great, I actually like the larger sized watch. Gonna get the foot pod soon. Definitely worth the price I paid.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Best running watch I have owned, April 10, 2012
By Zipitup
|
|
Compared to most of the other GPS running watches out there, this watch blows away the competition not only in value but also in customization. All fields on the watch are fully customizable and can be adjusted through the PC (a nice plus). Before using the watch I immediately updated the firmware. On my first run, it found satellite coverage in less than 30s. Though the software (Training Peaks) that comes with the watch is cumbersome and not user friendly (you have to pay for the upgrade), the exported files are fully compatible with the free edition of 'Sport Tracks' which does everything I could possible want. Overall I think this is an awesome watch and well worth the price since competing gamins with heart rate monitors are at least $50 more for their baseline models and almost double the current price if you want one that is waterproof (the Timex is water proof).
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Sceptical at first, April 10, 2012
By Majic
|
|
Read A LOT of reviews and did a lot of research before deciding on a GPS watch. I looked at all the Garmins and ultimatly settled on the Timex. What was the deciding factor you ask? It's because the timex is water resistant up to 50m. The cheapest Garmin that is was the 310 but that was around 400 bucks. Now to the product. Excellent GPS watch even before doing the firmware update. Right out of the box, well had to charge it first, but took it outside turned it on and > 2 min it had sat signal; every time after that it was > 30 sec. Did the firmware update and those times only improved. I'm very happy with the watch and would recommend it to anyone. Especially for the price you just can't beat it!
2 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Good GPS, erratic Display, November 8, 2011
By Beaudeau (Scottsdale, AZ USA)
|
|
This product does everything I wanted it to. I particularly like the elevation (they erroneously call it "altitude") readout. With no GPS use, the battery lasts almost two weeks before recharging from any USB port.
BUT the display is erratic, dimming unpredictably. I have had the watch for 3 weeks only, and will have to contact Timex if this persists. It may be a recognized manufacturing problem.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
what could be improved?, September 27, 2011
By Michal
|
|
I really like this watch. The plastic watch lens should be made of scratch resistant glass. The GPS works good but sometimes it takes up to 10 minutes to acquire satellite positions. When the watch is off only time is displayed and I cannot set the alarm or have a stopwatch function without turning it on. Otherwise I am very satisfied.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
timex global trainer = awesome, December 17, 2011
By david059
|
|
I just received my global trainer yesterday. I immediately charged it and then hooked it up to my mac notebook and training peaks. I was able to establish the settings as needed. The gps connected within one mnute. I ran this morning on trails and everything worked perfectly. What a great deal! I bought the watch, hr strap, and bike attachment new for $92 dollars and it was shipped for free.
I highly recommend this device. Ironman here I come! I can't wait to use it more. Very easy to use with all the bells and whistles you need for a great price. I love finding deals and this was a great one.
1 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great watch, May 24, 2011
By gregorka9
|
|
Excellent watch, does everything you need it to, never have had a problem finding satellites, can't wait to hook up more ANT+ accessories.
1 of 4 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
ES LO MAS MALO, December 5, 2011
By SANTIAGO HERNANDEZ
|
|
PÉSIMO Y PÉSIMO CON GANAS.
SOMOS UN GRUPO DE TRIATLETAS Y VARIOS COMPRAMOS ESTE RELOJ. QUE COSA TAN MALA, NO TENIA BUENA UBICACIÓN DE SATÉLITES Y A DURAS PENAS SE PUEDE TRANSFERIR LA INFORMACIÓN AL COMPUTADOR.HABLO EN PASADO POR QUE EL MIO DURO MENOS DE 3 MESES, Y COMO ES UNA COMPRA INTERNACIONAL VALE MAS DEVOLVERLO QUE EL PRECIO ORIGINAL.
NO RECOMENDABLE
1 of 9 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Ok, but there are better options for runners. Comparing it with Garmin Watches, January 5, 2012
By John Smith
|
|
I compare TIMEX GLOBAL TRAINER, GARMIN FORERUNNER 305 and GARMIN FORERUNNER 405CX.
TIMEX GLOBAL TRAINER
GOOD: 1. It is good for triathlon (the other two watches are not because they are not water resistant so that you can swim with them. The other 2 watches are water resistant up to 1 meter and only for a short time (less than 30 minutes)) because it is water resistant and can work in the water too.
BAD: 1. Garmin's have better website features and give more statistics (which are necessary). TIMEX asks you to pay for such features.
2. I was not able to get GPS connection after I run several times (this may be either because my watch is defective or perhaps this is something that could be fixed in some way even though I could not find it out even though I read the whole booklet).
GARMIN FORERUNNER 305 (The best watch for runners)
GOOD: 1. Garmin website features are great(!) and free.
2. It works with buttons - hence it is very easy to work with it while running.
3. Its light also operates with a button -- which is extremely important! (while running)
BAD: 1. It cannot be used as a regular watch.
GARMIN FORERUNNER 405CX
GOOD: 1. It can be used as a regular watch even though its color is unusual.
2. Garmin website features are great(!) and free.
BAD: 1. It DOES NOT work with buttons - which renders the watch unusable from the runner while running.
2. Its light also DOES NOT operate with a button(!) -- which is extremely important when you run in the night! (otherwise you cannot use the watch at all).
3. Forerunner 305 has better functionalities-features.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Product feedback, February 4, 2012
By Olirunner
|
|
Excellent product quality. Original packaging. Simple and easy transaction. Mailing fast and not expensive. For triathletes and runners who want to follow their progression near, that yhe product for you.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
very pleased!, January 30, 2012
By dan
|
|
With all the new gps watches on the market I did a ton of research before deciding on the global trainer. This unit is great. I upgraded from a forunner 205. I had a couple of reservations after reading some bad reviews, but the new firmware took care of everything for me. Get this watch. You won't be sorry.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Love it!, January 30, 2012
By Coley
|
|
The Timex Global GPS watch is great. Easy to set up and use. Great deal through Amazon. Can't wait to get out there and measure my performance!
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Timex Global Trainer, January 28, 2012
By Excel3
|
|
Overall the watch and its functions have been great. The one fault is that the GPS does not seem to be completely accurate. I have put in a few long trail runs with it and notice some differences in milage when compared to friends devices. I am not training specific distances, so I do not need to be extremely accurate. I just like to have an idea about how far I have gone to track general milage. For instance, I raced a 7.5 mile trail run and the GPS calculated 7.2. I did a 15.2 mile run and the GPS tracked 13.85. I can see how this may become problematic for an athlete training for a specific race, but it works great for me.
The other functions of the watch are great! Setting your own personal performance screens for each sport is handy and extremely easy. The HR is accurate and allows for accurate Calorie counting. Speed functions are accurate too, even despite the subtle inaccuracies in the GPS.
Overall, great training tool for a beginner to avid athlete. If your pro, I am sure you get way better toys for free.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Love the watch, BUT....., January 26, 2012
By JRose
|
|
So far the watch has been great. Easy to use, and I like how easy it is to configure through the Agent Device.
The bad. I HATE being held hostage to Training Peaks to see all of my data. That one issue alone will have me going back to Garmin... I think it's a tacky, back door hustle on Timex's part. It's bearable now because my coach is able to see my info through his premium account, but whenever we are done working together, I'm done with my Timex unless they offer a way to see my data without paying a premium for access to a glunky, hard to use site like TP.
Other than that, the GPS still takes a while to lock up, even with the latest firmware update, but that's not a big deal.
In the end, I love everything about the watch, I just can't get over the TP hustle.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great Training Watch, January 20, 2012
By Jstar
|
|
i have used this watch for about a month now and it was great. It kept up with my training times and when i uploaded it to the computer it graphed everything out for me. The battery life was great. The watch function are easy to use.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great as a second option, May 4, 2012
By Alejandro Mares (Orange County, CA)
|
|
First of all I am a Garmin user and have the 310XT and 910XT, which I love. But, the limitation with those watches is that I could never use them as simply a watch. I am an ultra marathoner so my only requirement is that the GPS last 10+ hours. I track my workouts and miles on multiple platforms (including TP) and my coaching is on training peaks so it is inevitable for me regardless of like or dislike. The watch itself after the firmware update seems to catch satellite reception quickly and is consistent with my Garmin's in terms of distance accuracy. I have 3 or 4 routes that I run and the distances match my Garmin Data. The amount of information that can be gathered from the watch itself is awesome. Naturally you will need to fiddle with the settings. I really like that I can change the settings on the computer that is a huge plus. I do not like that there is no vibrating alerts since I tend to run with music. I do find that I need to lock the screen because I have accidentally pressed the random buttons during the run. Honestly for the price this watch is a steal, especially since it includes foot pod compatibility and heart rate monitor.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
For young triathlon athletes only, way too complicated., April 21, 2012
By Eli Hardof (Orangeburg, NY, US)
|
|
First, let me describe myself to put my critique in context. I'm a 53 year old tech savvy professional. I've been using computers for over 30 years and HR watches for almost 20 years. So when I treated myself to the Global trainer I was excited to take advantage of many of it's features. After three uses, I repacked it and it's now on ebay.
First gripe: all the function buttons protrude too much so when doing any excersize that causes my wrists to bend back I end up pushing the buttons and either changing screens or screwing up the settings...this has happened frequently. The buttons need to be contoured upwards to avoid this gross design flaw. Second gripe: this is the least intuitive watch I've ever had to navigate. I wanted to simply use the stopwatch and ended up ruining my workout by spending 20 minutes trying to get that screen up and working(and then gave up). When I got home and pulled out the manual I found it had no mention of how to start/stop the stopwatch. I'm sure that the feature is there but it probably takes quite a few button combinations to find it, set it up and use. I've spent so far three hours dicking around with this watch trying to figure out basic features that on my Polar and Nike HR watches were accessible with one or two button pushes. Lastly, my third gripe is on behalf of middle aged men...I can not read half the symbols or text messages on the screen because they are in 2pt type, and I'm not going to wear reading glasses just to read the screen. I accept that when the watch is put into quad window mode things are going to be small but even in a single pane window none of the symbols are readable, oh and BTW, the crystal is not anti-glare coated so it reflects all the gym lighting terribly. I don't want a fitness watch that requires a seminar to understand.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great Product, April 21, 2012
By B
|
|
I have been using the Global Trainer for a couple of weeks now and am very happy with it. Prior to buying it I read the reviews and was kind of worried about if it would pick up satellites or if the software would be useless, but it is a great product. The watch picks up satellites well in my area, and the data lines up well with my phone and bike computers that I have brought along to check the watch's capabilities. I have absolutely no problem with the software that everyone is complaining about. It graphs my heart rate, speed, and elevation and shows my entire route. Not sure what else people are looking for.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Far under my expectation, April 13, 2012
By kcdlq
|
|
I have to say this product is far under my expectation. When I first started to use it, I could not sync to the GPS. And there is no way to set the time manually. Without the time, the watch is totally useless. Finally I was able to sync to GPS after half hour when I almost gave up. Another big issue is its power. After I fully charged the watch and used it in Power-Off mode (Time only), it can only run about 1 week. This is ridiculous. This means you have to take care the watch every week and bring the charger with travel. I can not image how it could be when the GPS function is open.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Pretty good for the price, April 13, 2012
By pilotfishbob
|
|
I purchased this when Amazon had them on sale for $100 back in December, and after reading DC Rainmaker's exhaustive review of the product I jumped on it since I can't afford to dole out $450 for the Garmin 910xt yet - maybe never. Up until now I've only had my Android phone with Endomodo to assist with run training, and the phone's accuracy can leave much to be desired though Endo is a pretty good app.
There were plenty of initial complaints posted regarding GPS acquisition times, but the first thing I did when I got this was to install the August 3, 2011 firmware update, which was noted as fixing the issue. It takes anywhere from 20 to 90 seconds to lock, and it works quicker if I just set the thing down somewhere while that's going on. It has yet to lose satellite lock once it's acquired it.
I've run several sanctioned events with it now and it's pretty accurate on distance. Looking at the GPS tracks in a viewer program the line wavers all over the place like the path of a drunkard, but that tends to be par for the course with these things. I can live with that as the final distance tally is what matters.
One thing I really wish it had was a vibration alarm like the Garmin 610 and 910. I have it set to notify me with data updates on the mile, which I've set as the default split. But the alarm is not very loud, and it's easy to miss.
Also, the buttons are very easy to push, and I've had it's battery run down a couple of times when it somehow got turned on in my gym bag. I wound up getting a small case to store it and the accessories in such a way that prevents that from happening.
You get a free account with Training Peaks, and the Timex-branded TP Windows or Mac app that you download for the watch is the only way to pull data from it as of the moment - I'm a Linux user so that's a huge pain in the rear, but I manage. You can also set the configuration on the watch using the app, which beats trying to do that on the watch itself. The free TP account is okay, but lacks some of the more extensive analysis plug ins which requires a paid subscription. That will work for 90% of users, I suspect. I purchased SportTracks as it has a one-time license fee vs. a subscription model and I want more rigorous analysis - It's easy to import the workout file generated by the TP app into it.
In summary - it may not be the best and it does have it's shortcomings, but I haven't been able to beat it for the price. As usual, your mileage may vary.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great for cycling, April 1, 2012
By M. Heintz (Houston, TX United States)
|
|
I have been using my GlobalTrainer now for almost a year. I have used it to track all my cycling activity. I will note that like other reviewers, I did have some issues with achieving a GPS signal. However, after a firmware update, I have consistently picked-up the signal relatively quickly. I find it best to turn on the watch to allow it to pick-up the signal while I am checking air pressure, etc. as part of my pre-ride checklist.
The TrainingPeak software has been fine for my needs. I wanted something simple to map my rides as well as keep a riding log. I haven't upgraded to the "paid" version as the free version has met all of my requirements.
Battery life has not been an issue. I have completed several century rides with this watch tracking all day long.
Although I don't have any issues with my current one, I am considering picking up a second one to have when my first one calls it quits.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
EXCELLENT EXCELLENT EXCELLENT, March 10, 2012
By Haus
|
|
EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT. I bought this watch for running in Afghanistan. I was a little nervous about if it was going to pick up a GPS signal over here. I took it out of the box and charged it over night. The next morning I went outside and started it up. Within 2 minutes I had 8 satellites locked on. The next time I used it, it only took 30 second to get a lock. You can customize the screen to what you want to see not just settle with what is provided. This is an excellent product and its water proof. Timex definitely out did Garmin on this one. Only down side for me is that I wish the grid could be displayed in MGRS. Again an EXCELLENT product and Super pricing. Thank You.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
timex gps watch, September 22, 2011
By ma
|
|
Great watch...Lots of options to see on display which i love. Getting the gps to find the satellite does take about 2-5 minutes...So far i don't have a problem with this watch..
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Timex, August 29, 2011
By Euge
|
|
Product received in excellent conditions, well packed and in excellent timing.
I'm overall satisfied with Amazon and with this product. Thanks
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
The global trainer, December 20, 2011
By Holbytla
|
|
This watch has many fine qualities, and I greatly appreciate its flexibility and usefulness, and as time goes on I hope to make better use of its functions. It has helped me greatly since I purchased it and it goes with me on almost every run. I bought one of the first units available in my area, and it has performed well, although I'm not sure that the heart rate monitor is accurate at higher effort levels. I have not spent the money on a stress test to find out for sure, but I don't believe that my maximum heart rate is 222, which it has indicated a few times, especially at my age. All in all though, it is a fine tool and I will use it until either it gives up or I can no longer run. "There will come a day when I can no longer run. Today is not that day." God bless
0 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Timex Global Trainer, December 14, 2011
By duckmantri
|
|
There were alot of mixed reviews on this product, ripped it out of the box this morning. I gave it a charge and put it to the test. I was very please with what I have seen so far. I used my Garmin FR60 to compare and they are both great products. The GPS portion picked up right away and the heart rate monitor was in step with my Garmin. The only problem with this product is the direction are in very small print.
0 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Good product, October 5, 2011
By Diego88
|
|
Product of excellent quality.
Did not like after trying to climb the paths on the site, and know that
there are benefits for paying.
Otherwise, I'm happy!
0 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great GPS watch, May 27, 2011
By CC
|
|
I have had the Timex Global Trainer for a month now. I love it!!! It helps me keep on track with pace and distance.
0 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great product, November 15, 2011
By Hugo Sepulveda
|
|
I've checked several reviews regarding this watch and for me it's been a great buy because I have all in one product
0 of 4 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great training watch at great price, January 18, 2012
By Dr. Jay
|
|
The Timex Global Trainer (TGT) has been great for marathon training. It records abundant information on speed, distance, heart rate, altitude, pace, etc. I haven't used it for biking or swimming yet, but it is designed to handle both with ease. The set up and use is very intuitive, and the level of customization of the data fields is impressive. Satellite hook up time and battery life have been greatly improved by latest software update. Heart rate strap has been balky - it occasionally looses data or reports incorrect information. Training Peaks software is ok, but not great - an upgrade to the Premium version would be nice. Sport Tracks software is free and easily uploads TGT data and allows more analysis. The large size of the watch isn't a problem and the numbers (especially with 2 or 3 data fields per screen) are very legible. At $120 or less this is a great way to add GPS to your training.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Everything that it's cracked up to be, January 14, 2012
By Stretch
|
|
I am training for my first marathon and I did extensive research on different GPS watches. Some reviews and users pointed out the Global Trainer's difficulties with connecting to GPS and satellites and bad mouthed this watch. After much back and forth I was not convinced by other watches within the $200 range and finally decided to give it a shot knowing that if it didnt work out I would return it. So, out the box I ran into connection issues immediately. Waiting more than 5 minutes to acquire a satellite connection = very frustrating. But I jumped online to read what other consumers mentioned and decided to upload the latest firmware from Timex. As soon as I did that, all connectivity issues were gone. My GPS locks in withing 45 seconds each and every time. Another little secret, was to place the watch on the ground as soon as you look to establish the link - works like a charm. The HRM is an awesome feature as well. With the RUN screenshot, I get to see my HR, distance, pace and total time. Now, I am the happiest with this wonderful watch. Great investment by my wife. After all, it was my Xmas gift!!! Highly recommended.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
what was titan engineers thinking?, January 13, 2012
By Prakash (Santa Clara)
|
|
I bought this watch as it has GPS with heart rate monitor and bike mount...sounds like a too good a deal right? Here is the problem, it shows the HR rate but there is no way to see how many calories you are burning???? amazing miss, any basic software will implement this feature first as everything needed to implement is already there...gps should be an additional feature not allows you to reduce existing features....
I see heart rate monitor, water resistant thus assumed that it will do calories count like all other watches does...bad assumption...and returning it back....Timex needs to learn to be clear and specify it anybody wanna use it inside gym it has no purpose for them this is only meant for runner....
Even if I am a runner , would still buy a watch which has both functionality....
And if you feel I am too critical than its because none of the reviews clarified it before.....and I went through all of them
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great watch!, January 13, 2012
By Christopher Shear
|
|
I have had this watch for a week and love it! It collects tons of data. The watch was very easy to set up and is very easy to use. The customizable screens are a nice touch. I love the GPS altimeter and the ability to view my routes in Google Maps. The hardwire connection and USB charging are much nicer than the bluetooth connection on my last Garmin or the Sonic link crap that was my last Polar. So far, very very happy. The watch is bulky but not heavy.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
buono, January 12, 2012
By riky
|
|
ottima la spedizione del pacco,in quanto all'orologio di buona funzione,da verificare meglio il funzionamento del gps nei km percorsi,non sempre corretto.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Timex Ironman Global training, January 12, 2012
By Antonio
|
|
So far I'm very happy with the Timex Ironman Global Training. The hearth rate monitor works pretty well, in my experience better than the Polar one I had in the past. The GPS takes like a minute to find the satellites if you are in the open, the options to customize up to for measurements is very nice. The performance pacer is ok but when you set a previous course you made it does not seem to compare the pace you had before only the total time so it works well if you maintain a constant speed but if the road has ups and downs it does not really give you an idea whether you are running at a better pace, something I thin can be improved in a new firmware release.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Decent watch, but software is TERRIBLE, January 7, 2012
By BLSeattle
|
|
Bought this GPS watch for running and multi-sport capabilities. Although I have few complaints about the actual watch and its performance, I am completely frustrated with the Training Peaks software that you use to track your workouts and updload your data. Quite frankly, it's awful. And it constantly prompts you and annoys you with ads to upgrade to its premier software to get added features. The basics are so terrible, that I could only imagine what a waste the upgrade would be. It's sad that Timex has created a nice product yet Training Peaks ruins it.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Don't buy this watch, January 7, 2012
By Runner
|
|
I have been running for years and have used many of the garmin products. I bought this one because I do tri's and like the look (more like a real watch). I was extremely disappointed with the performance. On many of my runs I finally take off without the GPS because it takes so long to lock onto the satellites. I would stick with Garmin..
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
love it, January 4, 2012
By ck_1224
|
|
it just came in for me today and i took it out for my first run after a quick charge. I must say I am very impressed with this gps watch it is my first one and I wouldn't want anything else.As I'm starting to get ready for triathalon season this is a priceless tool to train with and use on race day. This product can be a game changer... or a race changer and I am throughly Impressed.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
poor performing GPS, January 4, 2012
By Chuck
|
|
I have used my Timex Global trainer on 5 runs now. 2 of them were hilly trail runs, 3 were flat city runs. The GPS performed horribly in all cases. One example, running on flat city streets, it estimated that I had climbed and descended over 1000 vertical feet. If I had climbed and descended 30 feet that would have been alot. If I can't trust the GPS to get the elevations correct, then I can't be sure the distances are correct either. So what is the point of this watch? I'm still having to guess how much I am climbing and how far I am running. To get accurate GPS information, one needs to pay an additional $20/month. That's a rip off. I received it for Christmas and I plan to return it.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Cannot rate, don't know yet if working or not., February 12, 2012
By Max
|
|
Have tried to setup many times, also with new software. Tried to setup alerts, does not make any noise even if have set alerts every 1km and also set visual and audible alerts.
Would like to know if any other user had same problem with setting, have asked Timex through their site but no reply fm them. If doesn't ring up on every lap it is almost useless. Can do without almost any other features, but if don't know how it is actually going on with the training, you can leave it at home and just run, nothing else.
Can anyone suggest anything? Thanks.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
review, February 1, 2012
By van
|
|
This item was a little difficult to sync. Other than that the product is wonderful. Easy to assemble and ware.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
timex trainer, January 31, 2012
By John P. Gallagher Jr.
|
|
This is a gr8 multi-function tool. It fits comfortably and is easy to use. Also, the price could not be beat.
A great buy!
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
timex gps global trainer, February 5, 2012
By Johnny
|
|
gps Suck!!! It takes a Long time to get a signal for know on I stick with garmin they are highly reliable!!!
0 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
VERRY BAD, February 4, 2012
By alex
|
|
TIS IS THE WORST SPOTS WATCH TO BUY. I BIUGHT TO USE IT FOR MY FIRST MARATON AND DURING THE 26 MILES THE GPS SIGNAL NEVER CONNECTS, I HATE IT SO BAD. THIS WATCH SUCKS IT KEEP ME OUT OF CONCENTRARTION EACH MILE WHILE I WAS RUNNING AND DOESNT HELP ME WITH MY PACE AND MILES. NEVER BUY AGAING A TIMEX PRODUCT. AND I AM SENDING IT BACK AND MY MONEY BACK
0 of 3 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great training tool!, May 14, 2012
By Mark C
|
|
This works wonders for me when I need to know exactly how far I am going. The different modes is great for cross training. Great Fitness Tool!
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Great Product So Far, More to Follow over the Next Few Weeks!, April 5, 2012
By J Goodman (Littleton, CO USA)
|
|
I got my watch a couple of days ago and the thing wouldn't charge or turn on or nothing. Bad first impression, however, when I called Amazon the nice lady on the phone immediately apologized and sent a replacement out that would arrive the next day. This one is sitting next to me charging as we speak, so we shall see. Obviously there will be more to follow, stay tuned. [...]
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Excellent, March 6, 2012
By Alvaro Perez
|
|
A little big for my taste, but that's ok, the screen is detailed throughout. Material good, I hope lasts in time, but is good brand Timex
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Not Satisfied, March 3, 2012
By Steven Aponte (Yonkers, New York United States)
|
|
I'll likely come back and update this review, but I had to start with something.
The GPS tracking on this watch is HORRIBLE. It is slow to get a satellite sync. In fact, on about 12 of my 15 runs, it never got a sync. EVER. When it did get the sync, it was 4 miles into the run. Granted I am running in the canyons of NYC, but as my friend says, the free app on my phone does a better job than the ~$200 watch. And the phone isn't designed primarily as a GPS!
The watch also forces you to use TrainingPeaks.com, a semi-functional, ugly site with basic features unless you upgrade for $20/month. So while the watch is a good price, you have to pay more to get better use of your data such as heart-rate zones, etc.
An alternative to that is to get creative. Download the free version of SportsTracks, and import your pwx files stored in DocumentsTrainingPeaksDevice AgentsavedYOUR_USERNAME.
How 'bout them apples? I've used SportsTracks for 5 minutes and I plan on paying the onetime fee of $35. Well worth it.
One note- despite the fact that the two watches I've received from Amazon (original and replacement) arrived in 2012, they both came with the old firmware on the watch. The newest firmware if from August 2011, so the one on the watch is pretty old. I just updated it. Maybe I'll have better sync luck next week. Until then, this watch is mediocre at best. If it wasn't a gift, I'd have sent it back a LONG time ago. So much potential, it just hasn't delivered...
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Doesn't compare to a Garmin, March 3, 2012
By Jrunsc
|
|
Bought this watch after losing my Garmin 305, because A) it was cheap and B) it claimed it could do everything the Garmin could. I'll address B first. While the watch can, in theory, do everything a 305 can do, it cannot come close to doing it as well. The satellite acquisition is horrid, accuracy is horrid, screen is unreadable, backlight is a joke, menus and buttons were a nightmare to get used to, and essentially had no usable computer interface. If I had to pick a thing to hate most about it, it would be the three decimal places that the watch would read distance or speed to. The numbers were so small I could never make out what it actually said, and it was never accurate to within 2% much less .02%. The best thing about the watch was when turned off, it looked like an old school timex, with the time and everything displayed in nice big numbers. On the cheap front, it is a little cheaper than a Garmin, but you get SO MUCH MORE from Garmin. It's definitely worth the extra bit of saving. I decided to get rid of this one and go with the Garmin 310xt. Go with a 205, 305, or 310xt (405's are useless).
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
There's A Reason It was Discounted (Everywhere), March 3, 2012
By Mark Becker
|
|
Very little about this product is good. GPS rarely works, directions difficult to follow, I have yet to have the PC Sync connect and, BIG. My left arm weighs 1 pound less than my right from wearing this.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Excellent Watch, March 3, 2012
By Raymi Ugarte (NAPERVILLE, IL, US)
|
|
The watch has everything one would want. The GPS works perfectly; I first tried while driving on the highway and when sync with the software gave the exact route, miles and other factors with accuracy.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Timex Global Trainer Heart Rate and GPS Watch, March 20, 2012
By MBAc
|
|
The watch itself is (was) great. The capabilities are very useful. But the battery charger provided with the watch stopped working, and once the product returning period expired there is no way to get the watch to work. Anyone out there who intends to buy this watch, make sure you do monitor the watch's charging before Amazon's returning date expiration, otherwise if the battery charger is faulty you end up with a useless piece of plastic.
0 of 1 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Waste of money, March 17, 2012
By valentin enache
|
|
Had it for 3 months; It's a very poor product in my opinion.
For instance, it's supposed to sink time with the satellites, but failed to do so during the last time change. There is no way for me to set time and it would not pick up the correct time itself.
On numerous occasions, its GPS failed to lock into position, thus rendering it useless. I was outside, not even changing position, clear spot, but it still can't do it. When it does work, it takes 3-4 minutes to lock position, so be real patient.
Size is huge+, so you would be hard pressed to ware it as a normal watch.
I'm looking into returning it right now. Too frustrating.
0 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Good product, October 5, 2011
By Diego88
|
|
Product of excellent quality.
Did not like after trying to climb the paths on the site, and know that
there are benefits for paying.
Otherwise, I'm happy!
0 of 2 people found this review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
View Cart
Bookmark This Page
Contact Us
